시간 제한 | 메모리 제한 | 제출 | 정답 | 맞힌 사람 | 정답 비율 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 초 | 128 MB | 10 | 8 | 8 | 80.000% |
Arthur and his sister Caroll have been playing a game called Nim for some time now. Nim is played as follows:
Arthur and Caroll really enjoyed playing this simple game until they recently learned an easy way to always be able to find the best move:
It is quite easy to convince oneself that this works. Consider these facts:
Which means that if you make sure that the xor-sum always is 0 when you have made your move, your opponent will never be able to win, and, thus, you will win.
Understandibly it is no fun to play a game when both players know how to play perfectly (ignorance is
bliss). Fourtunately, Arthur and Caroll soon came up with a similar game, S-Nim, that seemed to solve this problem. Each player is now only allowed to remove a number of beads in some predefined set S, e.g. if we have S = {2, 5} each player is only allowed to remove 2 or 5 beads. Now it is not always possible to make the xor-sum 0 and, thus, the strategy above is useless. Or is it?
Your job is to write a program that determines if a position of S-Nim is a losing or a winning position. A position is a winning position if there is at least one move to a losing position. A position is a losing position if there are no moves to a losing position. This means, as expected, that a position with no legal moves is a losing position.
Input consists of a number of test cases.
For each test case: The first line contains a number k (0 < k ≤ 100)
describing the size of S, followed by k numbers si (0 < si ≤ 10000) describing S. The second line contains a number m (0 < m ≤ 100) describing the number of positions to evaluate. The next m lines each contain a number l (0 < l ≤ 100) describing the number of heaps and l numbers hi (0 ≤ hi ≤ 10000) describing the number of beads in the heaps.
The last test case is followed by a 0 on a line of its own.
For each position:
2 2 5 3 2 5 12 3 2 4 7 4 2 3 7 12 5 1 2 3 4 5 3 2 5 12 3 2 4 7 4 2 3 7 12 0
LWW WWL